*So you're saying that a "physics extracted from mechanism" which (let's assume) refutes mechanism, leads inescapably to a mathematical structure in logic-space which actually constitutes the "physical" universe. And thus we can justify and explain the physical laws without any reference to matter. Is that it or are their other implications?
* Bruno Marchal wrote: > Hi m.a. > > > if mechanism is true, then the "physical universe" appears to be the > border of the universal machine "ignorance". The cosmos is the tip of > the iceberg. And the laws of physics are really something which > evolved, yet not in a space time, but in a logical space gluing the > possible machine "dreams". I am not saying this is true, only that it > is a consequence of the seemingly innocent (for some naturalist) > mechanist hypothesis. > > It gives a way to justify the why and how of physical laws, and this > from mechanism, and this without making the (ad hoc) assumption of a > physical universe. And if you do the math, you get a physics extracted > from mechanism, and you can use it to confirm mechanism or to refute it. > > You can take the reasoning train which is currently passing. Mainly > the MGA can be understood by patient layman having some notion of > digital machine. > > Bruno > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ <http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/%7Emarchal/> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
