Le 24-nov.-08, à 02:39, Russell Standish a écrit :

> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 03:59:02PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> I would side with Kory that a looked up recording of conscious
>>> activity is not conscious.
>> I agree with you. The point here is just that MEC+MAT implies it.
> This I don't follow. I would have thought it implies the opposite.

MGA 1 shows that MEC+MAT implies lucky Alice is conscious (during the 
exam). OK?
MGA 2 shows that MEC+MAT implies Alice is dreaming (and thus conscious) 
when the film is projected. OK?
I take the "looked recording" as identical (with respect to the 
reasoning) with a projection of the movie.

Of course I don't believe that a projection of a filmed computation is 
conscious 'qua computatio". It is so absurd that sometimes I end the 
Movie Graph Argument here. I mean I consider this equivalent to false, 
and thus as enough for showing COMP+MAT implies false.
MGA 3 is intended for those who believes that the movie can be 
conscious qua computatio.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to