Le 24-nov.-08, à 02:39, Russell Standish a écrit :
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 03:59:02PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> I would side with Kory that a looked up recording of conscious >>> activity is not conscious. >> >> >> >> I agree with you. The point here is just that MEC+MAT implies it. >> > > This I don't follow. I would have thought it implies the opposite. MGA 1 shows that MEC+MAT implies lucky Alice is conscious (during the exam). OK? MGA 2 shows that MEC+MAT implies Alice is dreaming (and thus conscious) when the film is projected. OK? I take the "looked recording" as identical (with respect to the reasoning) with a projection of the movie. Of course I don't believe that a projection of a filmed computation is conscious 'qua computatio". It is so absurd that sometimes I end the Movie Graph Argument here. I mean I consider this equivalent to false, and thus as enough for showing COMP+MAT implies false. MGA 3 is intended for those who believes that the movie can be conscious qua computatio. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
