Hello Jack,

> I could tell you what's wrong with his MGA, but I'm here to deal with the QS 
> paper first.

I appreciate your prioritizing your paper, but I would be interested in 
what you find wrong with the MGA.

By the way, as I mentioned in a previous mail to John, my departure from 
materialism started with this book:


I also read your paper, and I my main problem is that you have strong 
physicalist (materialist) assumptions - that there is some matter in the 
universe which "instantiates" brain states.

That is indeed a problematic view - so maybe you could relate your take 
on the MGA?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to