Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 28 Jul 2009, at 13:38, David Nyman wrote:
>> be conceived for this purpose to
>> be 'sequentially resolving' each 'OM-programme-step'?  Indeed my
>> understanding is that this dovetailed sequentiality is actually a key
>> conceptual element of COMP.  
> Not sure to see what you mean. It is a key to be sure to go through all 
> 3-OMs, with the correct (recursively invariant) redundancy (without 
> which there would indeed be no measure possible).

What does "recursively invariant redundancy" mean?  Does it refer to the fact 
that the UD will compute the same state infinitely many times?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to