Flammarion wrote: ... > We might call these three notions of existence Q-existence, M- > existence and C-existence for short. My argument with you has been > that even if one wishes to postulate a single universe, M-existence is > an unnecessary middleman and doesn't even seem well-defined, all we > need to do is postulate that out of all the mathematically possible > universes that have Q-existence, only one has C-existence. > > The M-existence hypothesis is supported by the whole of science, and, > unlike the C-existence hypothesis, is in line > with the scientific claim that there was a long period when there was > no consciousness in the universe. > I'm confused by these last two paragraphs. Did Peter write both of them? The first seems to be against M-existence and the second for M-existence...or maybe I misunderstand?
Brent --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
