> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:13:54 -0700
> From: meeke...@dslextreme.com
> To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Emulation and Stuff
> Flammarion wrote:
> ...
> > We might call these three notions of existence Q-existence, M-
> > existence and C-existence for short. My argument with you has been
> > that even if one wishes to postulate a single universe, M-existence is
> > an unnecessary middleman and doesn't even seem well-defined, all we
> > need to do is postulate that out of all the mathematically possible
> > universes that have Q-existence, only one has C-existence.
> >
> > The M-existence hypothesis is supported by the whole of science, and,
> > unlike the C-existence hypothesis, is in line
> > with the scientific claim that there was a long period when there was
> > no consciousness in the universe.
> >   
> I'm confused by these last two paragraphs.  Did Peter write both of 
> them?  The first seems to be against M-existence and the second for 
> M-existence...or maybe I misunderstand?

The first of those paragraphs was from me. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to