Rex Allen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> Science advances in small steps that often depend on technology. I think
>> the next 'hard' question that has some chance of being answered is, what
>> information processes are necessary and sufficient to produce human-like
>> conscious behavior.
> Does the word "conscious" really fit there? So there is the question
> of how to implement a physical system that can be interpreted as
> producing human-like behavior.
> And then there is the further question of whether the production of
> this behavior is accompanied by "consciousness".
> I can configure physical systems in such a way that to me it
> represents something. For instance I can write software to run on a
> physical computer that produces outputs that to me represent "game
> characters" or something. With sufficiently clever software, I may
> interpret the outputs of the computer to be "behavior" that is more or
> less "human-like".
> But my interpretation may be doing all the work here. I may be
> deluding myself into believing that there is consciousness associated
> with the actions of the physical system I call a computer...when in
> fact there is no such thing there. The appearance of "conscious
> behavior" in the computer could be an illusion. Probably it would be.
It could be that other people are not conscious too.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at