Bruno,
Can you clarify the origins of the Lobian Machine? Does it arise
out of the theorem of Hugo Martin Lob? Is it shorthand for the "lobes" of the
human brain? What is the difference between a lobian machine and a universal
lobian machine? And how do they relate to the question of free will? Many
thanks,
marty a.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruno Marchal
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 17 Mar 2010, at 14:06, m.a. wrote:
But is there a deliberate feedback (of any kind) between first person and
UD?
No. The UD can be seen as a set of elementary arithmetical truth, realizing
through their many proofs, the many computations. It is the least
"block-universe" fro the mindscape. (Assuming comp).
How does the UD identify and favor our normal histories?
Excellent question. This is the reason why we are hunting white rabbits and
white noise. This why we have to extracts the structure of matter and time from
a sum on infinity of computations (those below or even aside our level and
sphere of definition). If we show that such sum does not "normalize", then we
refute comp.
How do the lobian numbers affect the UD. (I think you've answered these
questions before but not in ways that are clear to me. Please give it one last
try.) m.a.
Löbian machine survives only in their consistent extension. It is the couple
lobian-machine/its realities which emerge from inside the UD* (the execution of
the UD, or that part of arithmetic).
The free-will of a lobian number is defined with respect to its most probable
realities. They can affect such realities, and be affected by them. But no
lobian number/machine/entity/soul (if you think at its first person view) can
affect the UD, for the same reason we cannot affect elementary arithmetic. (or
the physical laws, for a physicalist).
Look at UD* (the infinite run of the UD), or arithmetic, as the block
universe of the mindscape. Matter is a projective view of arithmetic, when
viewed by universal numbers from inside it. Normality is ensured by relative
self-multiplication, making us both very rare in the absolute, and very
numerous in the relative. Like with Everett, except we start from the numbers,
and shows how to derive the wave, not just the collapse.
I just explain that if we take comp seriously, the mind body problem leads to
a mathematical body problem.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
