On Jan 25, 9:04 am, "Stephen Paul King" <stephe...@charter.net> wrote:
> Dear Bruno and Friends,
> While we are considering the idea of “causal efficacy” here and not
> hidden variable theories, the fact that it has been experimentally verified
> that Nature violates the principle Locality. Therefore the assumption of
> local efficacy that Mauldin is using for the supervenience thesis is not
> realistic and thus presents a flaw in his argument.
Local supervenience doesn't have to be argued from fundamental
physics. It can be argued
from neurology. Mental states arent affected by what goes on outside
the head unless
information is conveyed by the sense
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at