On 07/02/11 15:22, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I have debunked more than once on this list the idea that a movie can
think. (It is an error akin to the confusion between a number and a
gödel number of a number, a confusion between a description of a
computation and a computation, it is a confusion of the type finger
and moon (ultrafrequent in the field).
However, a movie can of course represent / be a train of thought. Then
all you need is the thinker. I am most intrigued to understand how your
theory gives rise to a thinker.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at