On Feb 4, 7:29 am, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03 Feb 2012, at 23:58, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > > Consciousness and mechanism are > > mutually exclusive by definition and always will be. > > I think you confuse mechanism before and after Gödel, and you miss the > 1-indeterminacy.
I don't think that I do. I only miss the link between the validity of the mathematical form of 1-indeterminacy and the logical necessity of the content: the qualitative experience associated with it. >You confuse Turing emulable, and Turing recoverable > (by 1-indeterminacy on non computable domain). That's probably true since I can't find any definition for Turing recoverable online. Are you saying that consciousness is not Turing emulable but merely Turing recoverable (which I am imagining is about addressing non-comp records to play or record)? Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
