On 18 Feb 2012, at 17:57, meekerdb wrote:
On 2/18/2012 2:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
but I don't see the point.
The point is to come back to the scientific attitude in the field
of theology.
Except the effect is to drag the baggage of the Abrahamic religions
into science.
What are your evidences for that. See "Conscience et Mécanisme" and my
papers, machine's theology is close to the Abrahamic religion as far
as they have succeed to keep the most of Platonism. It is more easy to
get arithmetical interpretation of Lao-Tseu, the philosophia perennis
(Aldous Huxley) and the platonists than the mainstream part of the
confessional religions, except for the sufi and the Kabbalah, which is
unfortunately hidden (mainly because those could be considered as
heretic).
You might be to quick on this. The mainstream religion, including
atheists, have adopted Aristotle's metaphysics, not Plato's one.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
