On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:36:32 PM UTC-4, John K Clark wrote:
> I disagree, I don't like it. You are assuming that there exists a 
> organized field of knowledge called "theology", but I can not find the 
> slightest evidence that is in fact true. Lawrence Krauss said that it is 
> his habit to ask every theologian he meets "what advances in theology have 
> been made in the last 400 years?", but he has never received a straight 
> answer from a single one of them, the best he has gotten was "what do you 
> mean by advances?". A expert in mathematics or physics or biology or 
> literature or ANY other field would not give a weasel answer like that, 
> they'd just rattle off a list of advances, but not theology.

Then we should stop teaching Newtonian physics as well, since there are no 
new advances there either. 

How about 'Anything that I deem unimportant should be eliminated.'? Do you 
detect any flaw in that reasoning?


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to