On 7/30/2012 10:20 AM, David Nyman wrote:
On 30 July 2012 13:11, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If we are removing ourselves from the object of our study we
must remove all things that are implied. It is the observer
that acts, not the object alone. All of the properties, such
as reflexivity, transitivity, symmetry, do freeze and cease to
be anything active.
You come back with your solipsist anthropomorphic conception of
the arithmetical truth. It does not work with comp at the start.
This seems moot to me. Could you be more precise about why we might
be justified in thinking of arithmetical truth as eternal but
nonetheless subject to change?
David
Dear David,
Thank you for highlighting this question. We need to understand how
Bruno explains Becoming.
--
Onward!
Stephen
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
