On 8/6/2012 10:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Is the translation or encoding a unique mapping? How many possible
ways are available to encode B?
There is an infinity of way to encode "B". Some can be just
intensionally equivalent (different codes but same logic), or
extensionally equivalent but not intensionally equivalent, like Bp and
Bp & Dt. They prove the same arithmetical proposition, but obeys
OK, do you not see that the infinity of ways that "B" can be
encoded makes the name of "B" ambiguous? The name of "B" is at most 1p;
a private name and thus subject to Wittgenstein's criticism.
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at