Hi Roger, The unextended aspect of monads is just an expression of the fact that within the monadology, it is not embedded in a space and thus has no measurable size.WE cannot think of monads as we think of atoms in a void. The idea is that we can recover the concept of an external space as a collection of possible locations purely in terms of internal states.
On 8/23/2012 6:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Stephen P. King > Monads are inextended, so can have no spatial presence. > Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net> > 8/23/2012 > Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so > everything could function." > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > *From:* Stephen P. King <mailto:stephe...@charter.net> > *Receiver:* everything-list <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com> > *Time:* 2012-08-22, 10:58:42 > *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy > with a chanceofthunderstorms > > Dear Roger, > > You are being inconsistent to the very definition of a > monad. They do not have an "outside" that could ever been seen > from a point of view and thus to think of them as if they do, such > as the concept of a space full of them (which implies mutual > displacement) if to think of them as atoms that are exclusively > "outside view" defined. Within the Monadology all concepts that > imply an "outside view" are strictly defined in terms of > appearances from the inside. > > > On 8/22/2012 9:09 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: >> Roger, >> >> Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc. >> These are the building blocks of space in integration-information >> theory. >> Richard >> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough >> <rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>> wrote: >> >> Hi Richard Ruquist >> >> You need to study the monadology. And the history of modern >> physics. >> >> Space does not physically exist for L (as for us) because it >> is empty, as the Milligan-whatshisname >> experiment proved a century ago. The notion of an ether is a >> fantasy. It doesn't exist. >> Photons just go from A to B through a quantum or mathematical >> wavefield, not an actual one. >> >> >> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net> >> 8/22/2012 >> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent >> him so everything could function." >> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >> *From:* Richard Ruquist <mailto:yann...@gmail.com> >> *Receiver:* everything-list >> <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com> >> *Time:* 2012-08-22, 07:06:07 >> *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be >> cloudy with a chance ofthunderstorms >> >> Roger, " monads are by definition nonlocal " does not >> mean that " space does not exist". Your logic is faulty. >> Richard >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough >> <rclo...@verizon.net <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net>> wrote: >> >> Hi benjayk >> In monadic theory,�since space does not exist, monads >> are by definition nonlocal, thus all minds in a sense >> are one >> and can commune with one another as well as with God >> (the mind behind the supreme monad). >> The clarity of intercommunication will of course >> depend, of course, on the sensitivity of the monads, >> their intelligence, >> and how "near" (resonant) their partners are, as well >> as other factors�such as whether or not its >> a clear�monadic weather day. >> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net >> <mailto:rclo...@verizon.net> >> 8/22/2012 >> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to >> invent him so everything could function." >> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >> *From:* benjayk >> <mailto:benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com> >> *Receiver:* everything-list >> <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com> >> *Time:* 2012-08-21, 17:24:01 >> *Subject:* Re: Simple proof that our intelligence >> transcends that of computers >> >> meekerdb wrote: >> > >> > "This sentence cannot be confirmed to be true >> by a human being." >> > >> > The Computer >> > >> >> He might be right in saying that (See my response >> to Saibal). >> But it can't confirm it as well (how could it, >> since we as humans can't >> confirm it and what he knows about us derives >> from what we program into >> it?). So still, it is less capable than a human. >> -- >> > > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." > ~ Francis Bacon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- Onward! Stephen "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." ~ Francis Bacon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
