Millions of times cause it just ain't true. But I do not want to interfere with your religion In string theory monads are definitely things in themselves.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Roger Clough <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Richard Ruquist > > Monads are reference to things, are like bookmarks. > They aren't the things themselves. How many times > do I have tio keep explaining this to you ? > > > Roger Clough, [email protected] > 8/23/2012 > Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so > everything could function." > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > *From:* Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> > *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> > *Time:* 2012-08-23, 11:10:48 > *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy > withachanceofthunderstorms > > How do you know that? > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Roger Clough <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Richard Ruquist >> >> Monads are simply a smart bunch of ASCII characters. >> >> Roger Clough, [email protected] >> 8/23/2012 >> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so >> everything could function." >> >> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >> *From:* Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> >> *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> >> *Time:* 2012-08-23, 07:05:17 >> *Subject:* Re: Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy with >> achanceofthunderstorms >> >> Roger, >> >> Please tell us how you know that. >> >> If you refer back to Leibniz, >> then you are treating >> science like a religion, >> making Liebniz into a prophet >> that must be believed. >> Richard >> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Roger Clough <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Stephen P. King >>> >>> Monads are inextended, so can have no spatial presence. >>> >>> >>> Roger Clough, [email protected] >>> 8/23/2012 >>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so >>> everything could function." >>> >>> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >>> *From:* Stephen P. King <[email protected]> >>> *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> >>> *Time:* 2012-08-22, 10:58:42 >>> *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy with a >>> chanceofthunderstorms >>> >>> Dear Roger, >>> >>> You are being inconsistent to the very definition of a monad. They do >>> not have an "outside" that could ever been seen from a point of view and >>> thus to think of them as if they do, such as the concept of a space full of >>> them (which implies mutual displacement) if to think of them as atoms that >>> are exclusively "outside view" defined. Within the Monadology all concepts >>> that imply an "outside view" are strictly defined in terms of appearances >>> from the inside. >>> >>> >>> On 8/22/2012 9:09 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote: >>> >>> Roger, >>> >>> Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc. >>> These are the building blocks of space in integration-information theory. >>> Richard >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Richard Ruquist >>>> You need to study the monadology. And the history of modern physics. >>>> Space does not physically exist for L (as for us) because it is >>>> empty, as the Milligan-whatshisname >>>> experiment proved a century ago. The notion of an ether is a fantasy. >>>> It doesn't exist. >>>> Photons just go from A to B through a quantum or mathematical >>>> wavefield, not an actual one. >>>> Roger Clough, [email protected] >>>> 8/22/2012 >>>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so >>>> everything could function." >>>> >>>> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >>>> *From:* Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> >>>> *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> >>>> *Time:* 2012-08-22, 07:06:07 >>>> *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy with a >>>> chance ofthunderstorms >>>> >>>> Roger, " monads are by definition nonlocal " does not mean that " space >>>> does not exist". Your logic is faulty. >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi benjayk >>>>> In monadic theory,�since space does not exist, monads are by >>>>> definition nonlocal, thus all minds in a sense are one >>>>> and can commune with one another as well as with God (the mind behind >>>>> the supreme monad). >>>>> The clarity of intercommunication will of course depend, of course, >>>>> on the sensitivity of the monads, their intelligence, >>>>> and how "near" (resonant) their partners are, as well as other >>>>> factors�such as whether or not its >>>>> a clear�monadic weather day. >>>>> Roger Clough, [email protected] >>>>> 8/22/2012 >>>>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so >>>>> everything could function." >>>>> >>>>> ----- Receiving the following content ----- >>>>> *From:* benjayk <[email protected]> >>>>> *Receiver:* everything-list <[email protected]> >>>>> *Time:* 2012-08-21, 17:24:01 >>>>> *Subject:* Re: Simple proof that our intelligence transcends that of >>>>> computers >>>>> >>>>> meekerdb wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > "This sentence cannot be confirmed to be true by a human being." >>>>> > >>>>> > The Computer >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> He might be right in saying that (See my response to Saibal). >>>>> But it can't confirm it as well (how could it, since we as humans can't >>>>> confirm it and what he knows about us derives from what we program into >>>>> it?). So still, it is less capable than a human. >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Onward! >>> >>> Stephen >>> >>> "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." >>> ~ Francis Bacon >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
