Millions of times cause it just ain't true.
But I do not want to interfere with your religion
In string theory monads are definitely things in themselves.

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net> wrote:

>  Hi Richard Ruquist
>
> Monads are reference to things, are like bookmarks.
> They aren't the things themselves. How many times
> do I have tio keep explaining this to you ?
>
>
> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
> 8/23/2012
> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
> everything could function."
>
> ----- Receiving the following content -----
> *From:* Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com>
> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
> *Time:* 2012-08-23, 11:10:48
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy
> withachanceofthunderstorms
>
>  How do you know that?
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>wrote:
>
>>  Hi Richard Ruquist
>>
>> Monads are simply a smart bunch of ASCII characters.
>>
>> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
>> 8/23/2012
>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
>> everything could function."
>>
>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>> *From:* Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com>
>> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>> *Time:* 2012-08-23, 07:05:17
>> *Subject:* Re: Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy with
>> achanceofthunderstorms
>>
>>  Roger,
>>
>> Please tell us how you know that.
>>
>> If you refer back to Leibniz,
>> then you are treating
>> science like a religion,
>> making Liebniz into a prophet
>> that must be believed.
>> Richard
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Stephen P. King
>>>
>>> Monads are inextended, so can have no spatial presence.
>>>
>>>
>>> Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
>>> 8/23/2012
>>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
>>> everything could function."
>>>
>>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>>> *From:* Stephen P. King <stephe...@charter.net>
>>> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>>> *Time:* 2012-08-22, 10:58:42
>>> *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy with a
>>> chanceofthunderstorms
>>>
>>>   Dear Roger,
>>>
>>> You are being inconsistent to the very definition of a monad. They do
>>> not have an "outside" that could ever been seen from a point of view and
>>> thus to think of them as if they do, such as the concept of a space full of
>>> them (which implies mutual displacement) if to think of them as atoms that
>>> are exclusively "outside view" defined. Within the Monadology all concepts
>>> that imply an "outside view" are strictly defined in terms of appearances
>>> from the inside.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/22/2012 9:09 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>>>
>>> Roger,
>>>
>>> Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc.
>>> These are the building blocks of space in integration-information theory.
>>> Richard
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi Richard Ruquist
>>>>  You need to study the monadology. And the history of modern physics.
>>>>  Space does not physically exist for L (as for us) because it is
>>>> empty, as the Milligan-whatshisname
>>>> experiment proved a century ago. The notion of an ether is a fantasy.
>>>> It doesn't exist.
>>>> Photons just go from A to B through a quantum or mathematical
>>>> wavefield, not an actual one.
>>>>   Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
>>>> 8/22/2012
>>>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
>>>> everything could function."
>>>>
>>>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>>>> *From:* Richard Ruquist <yann...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>>>> *Time:* 2012-08-22, 07:06:07
>>>> *Subject:* Re: NewsFlash: Monadic weather today will be cloudy with a
>>>> chance ofthunderstorms
>>>>
>>>> Roger, " monads are by definition nonlocal " does not mean that " space
>>>> does not exist". Your logic is faulty.
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough <rclo...@verizon.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi benjayk
>>>>>  In monadic theory,�since space does not exist, monads are by
>>>>> definition nonlocal, thus all minds in a sense are one
>>>>> and can commune with one another as well as with God (the mind behind
>>>>> the supreme monad).
>>>>>  The clarity of intercommunication will of course depend, of course,
>>>>> on the sensitivity of the monads, their intelligence,
>>>>> and how "near" (resonant) their partners are, as well as other
>>>>> factors�such as whether or not its
>>>>> a clear�monadic weather day.
>>>>>  Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
>>>>> 8/22/2012
>>>>> Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
>>>>> everything could function."
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Receiving the following content -----
>>>>> *From:* benjayk <benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com>
>>>>> *Receiver:* everything-list <everything-list@googlegroups.com>
>>>>> *Time:* 2012-08-21, 17:24:01
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Simple proof that our intelligence transcends that of
>>>>> computers
>>>>>
>>>>>  meekerdb wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "This sentence cannot be confirmed to be true by a human being."
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The Computer
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> He might be right in saying that (See my response to Saibal).
>>>>> But it can't confirm it as well (how could it, since we as humans can't
>>>>> confirm it and what he knows about us derives from what we program into
>>>>> it?). So still, it is less capable than a human.
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Onward!
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
>>> ~ Francis Bacon
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to