On 8/23/2012 4:53 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 Craig Weinberg <whatsons...@gmail.com
> The laws of nature are such that they demand that we do things
intentionally. This means neither random nor completely determined
I see, you did it but you didn't do it for a reason and you didn't do
it for no reason. I think Lewis Carroll best summed up your ideas on
T was brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
> Are your opinions on free will robotic or random? In either
case, would there be any point in anyone else paying attention to
Point? It sounds like you're asking for a reason, well such a reason
either exists or it does not. If other people pay attention to my
views they do so for a reason or they do not do so for a reason. If
other people do NOT pay attention to my views they do so for a reason
or they do not do so for a reason.
John K Clark
Does the chain of reasons stop at some point or is it an infinite regress?
"Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed."
~ Francis Bacon
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at