On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 8/23/2012 8:07 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote: > > Stephan, > > Thanks for the compliment. > I finally got someone with smarts to read it other than Chalmers and S_T > Yau. > > > Dear Richard, > > You are most welcome. I have learned to value the ideas of other > people, simply because one can never know what one has missed in thinking > about something. ;-) > > > > Time inflates along with 3 dimensions in the big bang. > Leaving 6 dimensions behind to compactify or curl up > into tiny balls 1000 planck lengths across each with 500 holes. > > So each 6-d ball is a fixed structure and 10^90/cc of them fill the > universe. > Hardly a single structure. > > > But isn't the entire 10d structure a "single" object". It could > embedded into a 11+ dimensional space and moved and rotated about, no? > Not according to Yau" http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Calabi-Yau_manifold#Calabi-Yau_manifolds_in_string_theory > > > Well I really cannot say how time works. Don't know if it is linear,or > nonlinear, > if it inflates or deflates. Most of string theory appears to threat time > as part of a 4-D background spacetime. The paper has little to do with > time. Perhaps it is required for Pratt theory? > > > I have thought about time a lot. It is the focus of my research, but I > have had to deal with many related issues (such as the mind-body problem) > to find a solution. > > Pratt's theory gives us a way to think about time as a sequential > ordering of events (consistent with Leibniz's ideas). Pratt's "residuation" > process can even be thought of as a generator of temporal sequences (for > each and every observer). I have found a way to model residuation using the > idea of bisimulation which is an equivalence relation between computations > and some Category theory. Time is thus understood as a local and first > person process that can, via concurrency, become objective (3p via > consensus of all bisimulating monads) and thus leading to the appearance of > a dimension (since the sequencings allow for mapping to the positive Real > Line in the continuum limit). One thing must be understood: to properly > understand Pratt's theory we have to adopt a Heraclitian > paradigm<http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/perspectives_on_science/v009/9.4pitt02.html>where > becoming (as opposed to Being) is fundamental. > By your method, can you understand why in the GR analysis of a black hole, the time dimension turns into the radial space dimension inside the event horizon. That would seem to give time some credence as a dimension. > > The reasoning about time that I used was mostly developed by Prof. > Hitoshi Kitada and discussed in his many papers: > http://www.metasciences.ac/Articles/works.html > > > > Richard > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Stephen P. King <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Dear Richard, >> >> Your paper <http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0044v1.pdf> is very >> interesting. It reminds me a lot of Stephen Wolfram's cellular automaton >> theory. I only have one big problem with it. The 10d manifold would be a >> single fixed structure that, while conceivably capable of running the >> computations and/or implementing the Peano arithmetic, has a problem with >> the role of time in it. You might have a solution to this problem that I >> see that I did not deduce as I read your paper. How do you define time for >> your model? >> > > > -- > Onward! > > Stephen > > "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." > ~ Francis Bacon > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
