On 9/24/2012 12:59 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen P. King
<stephe...@charter.net <mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:
>> Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
> I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise
that "you" are the only observer involved. Such nonsense!
Considering that there are a HUGE number of observers of the moon
What about the crater Daedalus on the far side of the moon, nobody is
observing it at this moment so does it exist right now? At any rate my
point was that if it's true that "there is no email message outside of
human interpretation" as Craig Weinberg asserted then it must also be
true that the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
John K Clark
Does the presence of the crater make a difference that makes a
difference, or equivalently, have a causal effect on other entities in
its environment? If yes then yes, it is "being observed". But its
"existence, qua necessary possibility is strictly a priori. Why do you
insist on conflating the possibility of a measurement outcome with the
measurement outcome? I think that Craig is discussing ideas that are
flying right over your head.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at