You do half of the procedure, then walk them back off, then the other half and walk them back off, then you do the whole procedure and walk them back off. This would give the subject at least an idea of any obvious problems with the procedure. > For example, someone could claim that photographing a > person destroys their soul, and they are no longer the same person. I > would point out that they behave like the same person and seem to > honestly believe that they are the same person, but the > counterargument is that this counts for nothing, since this would be > true of an identical copy and the original person would be dead. > Yes, there would be no way to undo taking a picture, so there isn't really anything better than the subjective interpretation to tell the difference. Craig > > > -- > Stathis Papaioannou > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/aclENmiLbekJ. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.