Hi Stephen P. King I saw a paper once on the possibility of the universe inventing itself as it goes along. I forget the result or why, but it had to do with the amount of information in the universe, the amount needed to do such a calc, etc. Is some limnit exceeded ?

## Advertising

Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 10/23/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-10-22, 14:35:15 Subject: Re: Interactions between mind and brain On 10/22/2012 6:05 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > I don't understand why you're focusing on NP-hard problems... NP-hard > problems are solvable algorithmically... but not efficiently. When I > read you (I'm surely misinterpreting), it seems like you're saying you > can't solve NP-hard problems... it's not the case,... but as your > input grows, the time to solve the problem may be bigger than the time > ellapsed since the bigbang. You could say that the NP-hard problems > for most input are not technically/practically sovable but they are in > theories (you have the algorithm) unlike undecidable problems like the > halting problem. > > Quentin Hi Quentin, Yes, they are solved algorithmically. I am trying to get some focus on the requirement of resources for computations to be said to be solvable. This is my criticism of the Platonic treatment of computer theory, it completely ignores these considerations. The Big Bang theory (considered in classical terms) has a related problem in its stipulation of initial conditions, just as the Pre-Established Harmony of Leibniz' Monadology. Both require the prior existence of a solution to a NP-Hard problem. We cannot consider the solution to be "accessible" prior to its actual computation! The calculation of the minimum action configuration of the universe such that there is a universe that we observe now is in the state that it is and such is consistent with our existence in it must be explained either as being the result of some fortuitous accident or, as some claim, some "intelligent design" or some process working in some super-universe where our universe was somehow selected, if the prior computation idea is true. I am trying to find an alternative that does not require computations to occur prior to the universe's existence! Several people, such as Lee Smolin, Stuart Kaufmann and David Deutsch have advanced the idea that the universe is, literally, computing its next state in an ongoing fashion, so my conjecture is not new. The universe is computing solutions to NP-Hard problems, but not in any Platonic sense. -- Onward! Stephen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.