On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:32:12 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Craig Weinberg
> > wrote:
>> If free will were, after all, an illusion, then there would really be not
>> much of an advantage in discerning intention to cause harm from a simple
>> propensity to cause harm.
> Free will is an illusion only if you define it in a logically impossible
> way, neither determined nor random.
Let's look at your suggestion. IF YOU (choose to) define it
What does that mean? How does it work? It sounds like it isn't random
right? So it must be determined? So are you saying "Free will is an
illusion only if it is defined by forces utterly outside your control in a
logically impossible way..."
Well that doesn't make sense either, does it? Who is this YOU that you are
talking to? Why do you think that the author of these words would have any
more insight into how this 'YOU' might define something than the author of
The dichotomy of random vs determined is not the only possible logic, and
it is not a useful logic for understanding participation and will.
> Since everything is either determined or random,
It isn't. My choices are not determined, nor are they random. They are
varying degrees of intentional and unintentional with deterministic and
possibly random influences which are necessary but not sufficient to
explain my causally efficacious solitude and agency.
> if something appears to be neither then that must be an illusion.
Illusions are a figment of expectation. What you call an optical illusion,
I call a living encyclopedia of visual perception and optics. Something can
only be an illusion if you mistakenly interpret it as something else.
> In any case, it is important to know if someone has intention to cause
> harm because that may be indication he is more dangerous to you than
> someone who causes harm accidentally. Whether the intention is driven by
> deterministic or probabilistic processes in the brain is not really
If intentional threats were deterministic or random then it would be
indistinguishable from any number of naturally occurring threats. The
prioritizing of intention specifically points to the importance of
discerning the difference between threats caused by agents with voluntary
control over their actions and random or deterministic unconscious physical
Think about it,
> Stathis Papaioannou
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at