Hi Bruno Marchal This is just an intuition. IMHO conventional physics and math applies to this bifurcated world, where every action produces a reaction, the world is objective/subjective, magnetic monopoles are impossible, etc.,etc.
This also shows up in quantum physics, where a bit can be both 1 and 0 and the same time. Here we obviously have the concidence of opposites, but since it is clearly mathematical/logical, perhaps there is some coincidence of opposites math or logic that can explain such weirdness. Maybe it's just that double roots appear in many of the equations. But often if this happens, one root cannot exist in this world as we know it, so no dilemma. [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 12/20/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-12-19, 14:59:12 Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind On 18 Dec 2012, at 15:55, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Bruno Marchal It would be interesting to see which logical statements apply to the monadic=quantum domain, which is beyond space and time. Part of Quantum Information theory. It is intresting of course and QM is a jewel, but you have quick in making identfication. QM should be how the digital is seen by the digital entities, and must be derived and not assume if you want the correct quanta-qualia relation. Bruno [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 12/18/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-12-16, 10:14:38 Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind On 16 Dec 2012, at 14:49, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Bruno Marchal Pardon my ignorance, but what is Dt ? Consistency of 0 = 0, or simply self-consistency. It is the modal Diamond in the modal logic of provability). It is the same as ~Bf (not provable false). D is the same as ~B ~ (like it exists is the same as ~Forall ~) In most modal logic, we have the "Aristotelian square", with B = necessary, and D= ~B~= possible. Bp ~Bp B~p ~B~p In the alethic (Leibnizian) mode: Bp = necessary p (true in all worlds), ~B~p = possible = true in at least one world (= not false in any world). In most classical modal logic systems, we have that: ~Bp = D~p ~Dp = B~p In particular ~Bf = D~f = Dt (t = "0=0", and t = ~(0=0), or simply they are the constant propositional truth and falsity). So the negation transforms B into D, and vice versa. You can test this on all intuitive modality Where B and D represents respectively: B = obligatory and D = permitted (deontic modal logic) B = everywhere and D = somewhere (space logic) B = all the time and D = sometime (logic of time) B = probability and D = consistency (logic of provability) B = necessary and D = possibly (Alethic logic) B = for all x, and D = it exists a x (quantifier) All such modalities will obeys different axioms, of course. Bruno [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net] 12/16/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Bruno Marchal Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-12-16, 04:47:59 Subject: Re: On the need for perspective and relations in modelling the mind On 06 Dec 2012, at 18:58, Richard Ruquist wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> > wrote: >> >> >> >> The 1p is not left out. Eventually comp singles out eight person >> points of >> view. If you think comp left out the person, you miss the meaning >> of the >> comp hope, or the comp fear. >> >> Bruno >> > > Why just 8? I would have expected every possible "person points pf > view" > consistent with MWI. Richard There is 8 main types of points of view given by: p Bp Bp & p Bp & Dt Bp & Dt & p See sane04 for more detail. Bp is the arithmetical formula beweisbar of G?l 1931, p is an arbitrary Sigma_1 sentences. In fact it is 4 + 4*infinity, as you have also all B^n p + D^m t with n < m. This gives a graded set of quantum logics. And they all have different "color" fro different machines, that is, the logic of those points of view are the same for all correct machines, but their explicit content can be completely different. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
