On 12 Jan 2013, at 07:00, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> He [me] would rather avoid those topics altogether and take solace
in denying specific instances of inconsistent or silly definitions
of God.
All I ask is a definition of God that has 2 attributes:
1) It is not silly or inconsistent.
You ask already a lot.
2) There is no other word except G-O-D that works as well.
And when 99.9% of the religious use the word "God" they mean a
omnipotent omniscient being who created the universe,
I am not sure of that. Even restricting ourself to Abramanic religion.
The beliefs are quite variate on this.
Bruno
and when non-religious people say they believe in God they mean they
believe in the word G-O-D and that's it.
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
