Not true. GR and QM derived experimental results that were not known to
science before hand.
I suggest that comp has to do that otherwise it will remain a curious
metaphysics
but not accepted as knowledge.


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 14 Apr 2013, at 19:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>
> But Bruno, if comp only produces what is already known to science, how do
> we know that comp is responsible? String theory has this problem
>
>
>
> We never know such thing. We can only propose a theory, derive facts, and
> verify them. If the facts follow the theory, we still don't know if the
> theory is correct or "responsible", not that it is true.
> In fact we can only hope that the theory will be refuted, so that we can
> progress.
>
> Now comp, especially in the weak version I propose, (It exists a level
> such that ...) is a very common assumption, a priori independent of
> physics, and it provides some explanation of the origin of the physical
> reality, based on the numbers laws only, so we can love it for its
> elegance, but in science we never know if a theory is true.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13 Apr 2013, at 15:13, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>>
>> Bruno,
>>
>> Could you explain by example how comp could be verified.?
>>
>>
>> This is more or less planned for the FOAR list.
>>
>> In a nutshell, using some image, comp says that the "big truth (about
>> consciousness and matter)" is in your head. With "you" = any universal
>> machine.
>>
>> So you can program a universal machine to look inward, and extract its
>> theory of consciousness and matter.
>>
>> To test comp, it remains to compare the matter part the machine found in
>> her head with the empirical facts.
>> This has been done, to some degree, and thanks to QM, it fits rather well
>> up to now.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> That is does comp predict something that is not also predicted by science?
>>
>>
>> ?
>> Comp is part of science. It is a theory (synonym: belief, hypothesis,
>> guess, idea, etc.).
>>
>> Physical science, seen as TOE, like with physicalism, presupposes a
>> physical reality, but if comp is correct, the physical reality is a stable
>> pattern emerging from coherence conditions in machines' self-reference, and
>> this is reducible to number theory, or to any theory rich enough to emulate
>> a Turing universal machine.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> What comes to my mind is consciousness.
>>
>>
>> Comp starts from some assumption on consciousness, (like its invariance
>> for digital substitution *at some level*), and then it is later plausibly
>> explained in term of some truth that some machine can "know" in some sense,
>> yet not prove or justify to other machine.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 12 Apr 2013, at 02:47, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>>>
>>> No they don't. An epiphenomenon is an emergent effect. The natural
>>> world is full of complexity and emergent phenomena.
>>>
>>>
>>> Like arithmetic, from which nature emerge itself, necessarily so (and in
>>> a verifiable way) if we assume that we have a level of digital substitution.
>>>
>>> I think you will not convince Craig, because he assumes from the start
>>> mind and matter and some relation/identification between them, in a non
>>> computational framework. But you are right, and patient, by showing him
>>> that he is not valid when arguing that comp *has to* be wrong.
>>>
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to