On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:21 PM, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:
>> You keep assuming that because I don't vow allegiance to the MWI faith
>> that I reject it. I said I liked it, I'm just not compelled to accept it
>> so long has it has not empirical advantage.
> Okay, I understand that position. However, I think right now we are in a
> state similar to that time when heliocentrism and geocentrism were debated,
> but before either was proven by observations of parallax. Neither theory
> has suffered a fatal blow, but there is a theory that is a little simpler.
> Would the creation of a working quantum computer that can factor thousand
> digit numbers (which not even an Earth-sized classical computer could) be a
> parallax moment for you?
I would be interested to hear your answer on this. It seems relevant given
John Clark's new thread on the creation of a quantum computer that is
faster than a classical computer.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.