On 10 May 2013, at 18:11, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/10/2013 1:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You beg the question. Nothing is irreversible.
On the contrary it is you who are begging the question. You are
claiming that measurements are reversible because your theory says
they are reversible, even though in practice they are not, and
this shows your theory is right.
To be sure, this is an open problem in comp, but the material
hypostases suggest that the core physics will be symmetrical, but
we can't say much more. But the empirical evidences is that
everything is reversible in nature, even falling in a black hole.
Our best theory is that everything is CPT invariant, not T invariant.
OK.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
