Hi Pantheon Perhaps somebody can correct me on this. More details below.
I'm no physical genius, I just applied some common sense by noting that, under the right conditions (limited bandwidth), you can express a one-dimensional (1d) signal in time from a 0 dimensional set of numbers. Continuing in this way, one can go from 0d-->1d---->2d---->3d Since one can regard the orginal set of numbers (in 0d) as mental, one ends up creating a 3d object out of just numbers (mental ideas.) Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000] See my Leibniz site at http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough ----- Receiving the following content ----- From: Roger Clough Receiver: Time: 2013-06-28, 12:03:09 Subject: *******The holographic principle is a rational justification for idealism****** > >*****The Holographic Principle---A rational justification for idealism*****. > >The holographic principle seems to be an epplication similar to discretization >of >continuous signals. In that case, there is no loss in information in >converting a continuous time signal into an indexed set of point values, as >long as the sampling rate is twice the highest frequency in a continuous >signal. > >This might be a physical vbasis for Leibniz's discrete samplings of >images giving the "whole" picture. > >Continuing that line of thought, and under the proper cicumstances, > >(from 3 to 2 dimensions) >> infomation in a volume = information in the >volume's surface. > > >(from 2 to 1 dimensions) >> infomation in a surface= information in the >moving line describing the surface > > ( from 1 to 0 dimensions) >> >>> infomation in the smoving line = information in an indexed set of signal >>> values > > > >Monadization of a 3d physical violume would then be successively > >3d to 0d mental point > > > > >----- Have received the following content ----- >Sender: Roger Clough >Receiver: 4dworldx >Time: 2013-06-28, 11:04:56 >Subject: Smolin, the Holographic Principle and Modern Physics > > > >> >> >>It appears that Smolin is using the Holographic principle HP (below) >>to find an alternate representation for Einstein's equations. >>This also pops up in theories of the black hole, which has a vortex-shaped >>surface. >>Also (not shown below) the relationship between a membrane and some related >>volume. The flat geometry of the universe may be another example. >> >>This being so, it would seem that the contents of a brain >>should be given in the brain's surface, just as the >>cylindrical surface of a neuron should contain the "thought" within. >> >> >> >>http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/research/gr/public/holo/ >> >>The Holographic Principle (that a surface can completely define the volume >>within) >>and Modern Physics >> >> >>In 1993 the famous Dutch theoretical physicist G. 't Hooft put forward a bold >>proposal which is >>reminiscent of Plato's Allegory of the Cave. This proposal, which is known as >>the Holographic Principle, >>consists of two basic assertions: >> >>Assertion 1 The first assertion of the Holographic Principle is that all of >>the information contained in >>some region of space can be represented as a `Hologram' - a theory which >>`lives' on the boundary of that region. >>For example, if the region of space in question is the DAMTP Tearoom, then >>the holographic principle asserts >>that all of the physics which takes place in the DAMTP Tearoom can be >>represented by a theory which is defined on the walls of the Tearoom. >> >>Assertion 2 The second assertion of the Holographic Principle is that the >>theory on the >>boundary of the region of space in question should contain at most one degree >>of freedom per Planck area. >>A Planck area is the area enclosed by a little square which has side length >>equal to the Planck length, a >>basic unit of length which is usually denoted Lp. The Planck length is a >>fundamental unit of length, because >>it is the parameter with the dimensions of length which can be constructed >>out of the basic constants >>G (Newton's constant for the strength of gravitational interactions), ? >>(Planck's constant from quantum mechanics), >>and c (the speed of light). A quick calculation reveals that Lp is very small >>indeed: >> >>To many people, the Holographic Principle seems strange and counterintuitive: >> >>How could all of the physics which takes place in a given room be equivalent >>to >>some physics defined on the walls of the room? Could all of the information >>contained in your body actually be represented by your `shadow'? >> >> >> >>Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000] >>See my Leibniz site at >>http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
