On 28 Jun 2013, at 20:35, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 26.06.2013 15:53 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 23 Jun 2013, at 22:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 23.06.2013 20:07 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 23 Jun 2013, at 15:07, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Soren Brier, Cybersemiotics: A New Foundation for
Transdisciplinary Theory of Information, Cognition, Meaningful
Communication and the Interaction Between Nature and Culture,
INTEGRAL REVIEW, June 2013, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 220-263.
http://integral-review.org/documents/Brier,%20Cybersemiotics,%20Vol.%209,%20No.%202.pdf
...
I would not oppose this to "scientific classical explanation".
By doing this, Brier makes impossible to change the theories
which fail, and that can lead to the frequent means of hiding the
question by a verbal sort of hypnotism, I think. If the current
explanation does not work, we have to try to understand why and
correct it accordingly.
I believe that the author remains within science. Well, this
clearly depends on definition. The author just wanted to include
humanitarian sciences into science. You means that this does not
make sense?
You should not have unquote it. I remember reading that he was
criticizing the use of "classical science", and my point is that this
is exactly what we should not done in the human science. He was, like
the pseudo-priests, excluding humantarian science from science.
Do you mean this sentence
"But the theories of the phenomenological life world and the
hermeneutics of the meaning of communication seem to defy classical
scientific explanations."
This one, yes. the hermeneutics might defy Aristotle metaphysics, but
why to subscribe to it given that we have not yet abroad the mind-body
problem.
The problem is not with classical science, but with the fact that the
author seems unable to challenge *some* theories.
But this was from the abstract you gave, so if the paper is more
interesting, don't take this too much seriously. But it seems to me
that he was confusing science with Aristotle metaphysics (like many).
Bruno
Or this one
"I begin with a brief introduction to my view of scientific thinking
on deep theories and a few words about the limitation of the word
‘science’ in the English language and my proposal to use the German
transdisciplinary term ‘Wissenschaft’, which includes qualitative
research into meaning."
Frankly speaking, I do not see how your comment is related to the
paper.
Evgenii
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
