On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/25/2013 8:54 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:45 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/23/2013 3:00 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:11 AM, John Mikes<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Telmo:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> would you have (by any chance...) a brief identification of something
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> comes to your mind when speaking about  " l i f e "  ? (And please,
>>>>>> forget
>>>>>> about the"bio" of this Earthbound Terrestrial Biosphere).
>>>>>> (To identify " live " is a bit easier I think.)
>>>>
>>>> Hi John,
>>>>
>>>> If I understand your question, I think I do have a general idea of
>>>> what I, informally, associate with life. I always tend to imagine some
>>>> self-contained system that is capable of procuring sources of energy
>>>> in its environment and use that energy to, more or less, maintain it's
>>>> structure.
>>>
>>>
>>> For 'life', in contrast to 'being alive', I'd add reproduction. That's
>>> the
>>> real defining characteristic of life.
>>
>> I tend to agree, but maybe we're on the verge of transcending that. If
>> we clone some organism is it still reproduction? What if we tweak the
>> DNA?
>
>
> Sure. It doesn't even have to involve DNA.  As Bruno pointed out cigarettes
> reproduce too.

Ok!

>
>>
>>>> None of the robots that I've seen so far fit this ideal. Even if they
>>>> can look for an outlet and recharge their batteries, they are not
>>>> capable of deeply fixing themselves. They cannot use that energy to
>>>> rebuild some part of themselves that is damaged.
>>>
>>>
>>> And your ability to do that is quite limited.  So if a robot could
>>> replace a
>>> damaged limb with one from a supply cabinet it'd be one up on us.
>>
>> Sure, but I feel there's something to the deep mechanisms of living
>> organisms, as I stated in my reply to John. I'm waxing poetic a bit
>> here, sorry!
>
>
> What's 'deep' is that there's a whole complex interdependent system of life.
> You couldn't maintain your body if there were not all those plants and
> animals from which you can get pre-built proteins. Just like cigarettes
> couldn't reproduce without tobacco farmers.

Also ok :)

Telmo.

> Brent
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to