On 16 October 2013 16:01, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > "Our theory in a certain sense bridges the positions of Einstein and Bohr, > since the complete theory is quite objective and deterministic...and yet on > the subjective level...it is probabilistic in the *strong sense* that > there is no way for observers to make any predictions better than the > limitations imposed by the uncertainty principle." > > So he explicitly says the fully deterministic theory (fully deterministic > from the God's eye, third person view) leads to probabilistic > (random/unpredictable) outcomes from the subjective observer's first person > view. Even an observer who had complete knowledge of the deterministic > wave function and could predict its entire evolution could not predict > their next experience. > > Technically they can. They can correctly predict that they will have *all*the > available experiences. It's only after the measurement has been made that there is an *appearance* of probability, with each duplicate feeling that he has experienced a probablistic event. But that feeling only arises from the assumption (or gut feeling) that there is only one observer, both before and after the measurement.
(However, I imagine everyone here understands this...???) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
