On 16 October 2013 16:58, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2013, at 10:10 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16 October 2013 16:01, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "Our theory in a certain sense bridges the positions of Einstein and >> Bohr, since the complete theory is quite objective and deterministic...and >> yet on the subjective level...it is probabilistic in the *strong sense*that >> there is no way for observers to make any predictions better than the >> limitations imposed by the uncertainty principle." >> >> So he explicitly says the fully deterministic theory (fully deterministic >> from the God's eye, third person view) leads to probabilistic >> (random/unpredictable) outcomes from the subjective observer's first person >> view. Even an observer who had complete knowledge of the deterministic >> wave function and could predict its entire evolution could not predict >> their next experience. >> >> Technically they can. They can correctly predict that they will have *all > * the available experiences. > > > That's the third person view. The view of the wavefunction's evolution. > That is completely predictible. > > Whether or not you will measure the electron to be spin up or spin down > you can't predict in advance. That is because you experience both but > neither experiences it as being both spin up and spin down. > > I don't see how that's different from what I said - "*afterwards*, they will feel that they've experienced a probablistic event."
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
