On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Quentin Anciaux <allco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, you still find nothing to say about many-worlds interpretation of QM
> where you are duplicated billions of time a picosecond, but you are able to
> babble for years about a simple duplication experiment ?
The following is a flow diagram of the conversation we've been having on
Step 1: Quentin Anciaux states that John Clark treats Everett's ideas and
Bruno's ideas inconsistently.
Step 2: John Clark points out the ways Everett's ideas about probability
and prediction and Bruno's ideas about the nature of self are fundamentally
Step 3: Quentin Anciaux neither agrees nor disagrees with John Clark's
Step 4: Quentin Anciaux inserts one or more personal insults directed at
Step 5: GOTO step 1.
PS: 9 question marks following 9 rhetorical questions in a row is too much.
John K Clark
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.