On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, you still find nothing to say about many-worlds interpretation of QM > where you are duplicated billions of time a picosecond, but you are able to > babble for years about a simple duplication experiment ? > The following is a flow diagram of the conversation we've been having on this thread: Step 1: Quentin Anciaux states that John Clark treats Everett's ideas and Bruno's ideas inconsistently. Step 2: John Clark points out the ways Everett's ideas about probability and prediction and Bruno's ideas about the nature of self are fundamentally different. Step 3: Quentin Anciaux neither agrees nor disagrees with John Clark's points. Step 4: Quentin Anciaux inserts one or more personal insults directed at John Clark. Step 5: GOTO step 1. PS: 9 question marks following 9 rhetorical questions in a row is too much. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
