On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrot

> >>> Yes. After St-Thomas, most catholic theologian agree that God cannot
>> make 17 into a composite number. God obeys to logic,
>>
>
> >> So the God theory has zero explanatory power
>
> > That does not follow.
>

I think it does.


> > Newton's theory obeys to logic too.
>

Yes, neither Newton's theory nor the God theory can explain why there is
something rather than nothing, so why pick the theory that just inserts
pointless wheels within wheels?

>
> >> Even for questions less deep the "God has power" theory still explains
>> nothing unless it can explain exactly how that "power" works, and if you
>> understand all about that "power" then God Himself becomes redundant, a
>> useless fifth wheel. For example, if you say that God created the first
>> living organism on the Earth 4 billion years ago that explains nothing
>> unless you can explain how He did it, and if you know that you don't need
>> God.
>>
>
> > I have already insist that God cannot be part of the explanation. We
> agree on this.
>

Then I repeat my question, why add useless wheels within wheels that
explain nothing to otherwise nice theories?

  John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to