On 30 December 2013 22:30, Edgar L. Owen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Stephen, Jason, Liz,
>
> The answer is very simple when one understands there are two kinds of
> time. Present moment P-time is the processor cycle of the computations, and
> the computations compute clock time.
>
> The computations MUST take place in time of some sort to compute anything.
>

This is, of course, a circular argument.

>
The fact that there is a logical sequence that isn't moving gives us
> nothing. All comps, including Bruno's, must face this problem which Liz
> properly raises....
>

This is, of course, only true if one has failed to grasp the block universe
view.


> OK, I'm ducking, but nevertheless it's the only reasonable explanation!
> :-)
>

Hmm, looks like a smidgeon of progress here.


>
> Edgar
>
>
> On Monday, December 30, 2013 12:43:34 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
>> Dear Jason,
>>
>>   You seem to be ignoring the role of the transitory that is involved in
>> the discussion here. The fact is that we are asking questions about things
>> we are trying to understand. Merely stating that this is that ignores the
>> point. Where doth change emerge if it does not exist at all?
>>   This is my problem with Platonia, it has no explanation for the
>> appearance of change. We can point at this or that (figuratively speaking)
>> as an explanation, but the finger that points does not vanish upon
>> alighting on the answer.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Stephen Paul King <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>
>>>>   So what is turning the "knob" on the values of y (or x)?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing, the whole graph exists at once, but y varies as x varies.  Why
>>> does x=1,y=9 have to be destroyed to make room for x=2,y=11?  What does
>>> destroying the previous state add to x=2,y=11 that wasn't there before?
>>>
>>> Now consider we aren't dealing with a simple line, but an equation
>>> tracing the interactions of all the particle interactions in your brain.
>>>  If x=1 corresponds to your consciousness in time 1, and x=2 corresponds to
>>> your consciousness in time 2, then how would destroying the x=1 state
>>> change your conscious state for x=2?
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Stephen Paul King <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Brent,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    I have a persisting question. How is is that we can get away with
>>>>>> using verbs (implying actions) when we are describing timeless entities?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>  In the same way we can say that y increases as x increases, in the
>>>>> graph of y = 2x + 7
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>> topic/everything-list/7G5zm5OFT0k/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kindest Regards,
>>
>> Stephen Paul King
>>
>> Senior Researcher
>>
>> Mobile: (864) 567-3099
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>>  http://www.provensecure.us/
>>
>>
>> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
>> the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
>> information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and
>> exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as
>> attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
>> hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
>> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message
>> immediately.”
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to