On 3 January 2014 10:20, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Edgar, > > Everything you describe above is consistent with coordinate time (which is > equal to the time reported by a clock at absolute rest). The problem then > becomes defining some reference for absolute rest... > > You can do it, but it won't explain anything that is not already accounted > for by relativity. >
Ooh, please sir, I know what it is! I suggested the CMB might define Edgar's absolute rest frame :-) (But I think I will have to wait a long time before he tells me the testable consequences that differentiate his theory from SR.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
