On 3 January 2014 10:20, Jason Resch <jasonre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everything you describe above is consistent with coordinate time (which is
> equal to the time reported by a clock at absolute rest). The problem then
> becomes defining some reference for absolute rest...
> You can do it, but it won't explain anything that is not already accounted
> for by relativity.
Ooh, please sir, I know what it is!
I suggested the CMB might define Edgar's absolute rest frame :-)
(But I think I will have to wait a long time before he tells me the
testable consequences that differentiate his theory from SR.)
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.