On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Telmo Menezes <te...@telmomenezes.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:26 AM, freqflyer07281972 > <thismindisbud...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "SEEKING A COMPATIBLE WOMAN OR LONG TERM COMPANION: I'm seeking a > > compatible, loyal, caring, natural, affectionate, non-feminist woman who > > believes that male female relationships should not be adversarial or > > selfish, but based on mutual love, trust and benefit. Hopefully young and > > healthy enough to be able to help me out through my old age. I'm also > open > > to the possibility of a long term possibly live in friend or companion to > > share my house and help take care of things. Someone quiet, peaceful and > > down to earth who appreciates my work and lifestyle would be ideal. That > > could be either a man or woman or even a couple. If you are interested in > > discussing this further or know someone who might be please feel free to > > contact me at edgaro...@att.net. " > > > > And you said i didn't read things... > > This is none of our business nor is it relevant in any way. > Being a big defender of the right to anonymity, it makes me sad that > you use yours against Edgar in such a low fashion. > > "Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds > discuss people." > -- Eleanor Roosevelt > > Sure, but Edgar did start this nonsense challenging provocatively "I have a life partner. A truly wonderful one. You?"; with all those implications. That's where "this is none of our business" started and derailed the thread in that fashion. Isn't this rather: As you sow, so you shall reap? Can a flasher complain *to the person they just...inappropriately exposed themselves to*, that his privacy was violated unfairly? Good question these days, what with privacy, consent, digital spying, cryptography etc... Don't get me wrong though. I guess snooping is low like flashing, consent of some party is violated in both cases. If you denounce one, you have to denounce the other though; that is, if you want to keep your denouncer street cred, uhm credible, solid, consistent, peer reviewed and mirror truth in the absolute because it's simply, really true, ok?. Good. ;-) PGC > > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:21:39 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > >> > >> Freq, > >> > >> But I have a life partner, a truly wonderful one. > >> > >> You? > >> > >> Edgar > >> > >> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:03:55 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: > >>> > >>> Also, I am really starting to understand why you have difficulty with > >>> finding a life partner. > >>> > >>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:02:30 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 wrote: > >>>> > >>>> OK. > >>>> > >>>> http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adfm.201200640/abstract > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:56:09 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Freq, > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes it is too easy. Do you actually read anything before you respond? > >>>>> Note I said "that could replace biological neurons one by one". > >>>>> > >>>>> Send me a few links referencing that being possible please.... > >>>>> :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> Edgar > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:51:13 PM UTC-5, freqflyer07281972 > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 8:24:31 PM UTC-5, Edgar L. Owen wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jason, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There are no 'synthetic neurons' that could replace biological ones > >>>>>>> "one by one". When there are let me know and I'll check them out > and answer > >>>>>>> your question. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You are letting your imagination run wild here imagining things > with > >>>>>>> no basis in reality as if they were true. When we study reality we > study > >>>>>>> what is actually true, not sci fi no matter how 'cool' it's > thought to > >>>>>>> be.... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Edgar > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://metabiological.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/first-synthetic-neuron-created/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://www.princeton.edu/pccmeducation/undergrad/reu/researchprojects/REU2008Presentations/duseja-richardson.pdf > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/hybrids.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://www.dvice.com/2012-12-2/worlds-most-complex-artificial-brain-ever-passes-iq-tests > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is too easy... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Does Edgar have a higher difficulty setting? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Everything List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
