On 16 January 2014 14:11, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > > You can do that (in fact it may have been done). You have two emitters > with polarizers and a detector at which you post-select only those > particles that arrive and form a singlet. Then you will find that the > correlation counts for that subset violates Bell's inequality for polarizer > settings of 30, 60, 120deg. > > I assume that means Price's (and Bell's) assumption that violations of Bell's inequality can be explained locally and realistically with time symmetry is definitely wrong...?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
