On 16 January 2014 14:11, meekerdb <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

> You can do that (in fact it may have been done).  You have two emitters
> with polarizers and a detector at which you post-select only those
> particles that arrive and form a singlet.  Then you will find that the
> correlation counts for that subset violates Bell's inequality for polarizer
> settings of 30, 60, 120deg.
> I assume that means Price's (and Bell's) assumption that violations of
Bell's inequality can be explained locally and realistically with time
symmetry is definitely wrong...?

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to