On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:31 PM, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/16/2014 10:32 AM, Jason Resch wrote: > > They only 'seem to' because you neglect the fact that in the experiment >> you don't use the digits of pi from Platonia, you use their physical >> instantiation as calculated in the registers of a computer or written ink >> on a page. >> > > And what is the physical link between the computer's registers and the > radioactive decay? > > > They have common events in their past light cone. > But is that enough to explain the link? It permits a non-superluminal link, but what is that link, if not some spooky, invisible, causal-agreement-enforcening mechanism? > > What keeps it from breaking down in the next moment? > > > Why are there regularities that can be represented by the laws of > phyiscs? Dunno. > But here, there regularities are not from following from any laws, at least not compressible ones. Jason > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
