On 04 Feb 2014, at 06:49, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Then explain why you don't read the UDA, or why you don't read AUDA,
which is the same thesis, but no more using thought experiences.
AUDA was for the mathematicians who told me that they are not
interested in cognitive science or philosophy of mind, where such
thought experience is common.
If UDA and AUDA are equivalent in some sense, how do you get the FPI
conclusion from AUDA?
In AUDA we get only the case of the "probability one", by Bp & Dt, on
p sigma_1.
Why?
Well that is what I am explaining, but I need Liz solving some puzzles
before :)
They don't seem very similar to me at all.
AUDA is much more abstract. I will explain the relations soon.
Bruno
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Principal, High Performance Coders
Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
