On 5 February 2014 00:36, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04 Feb 2014, at 06:49, Russell Standish wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> >>> Then explain why you don't read the UDA, or why you don't read AUDA, >>> which is the same thesis, but no more using thought experiences. >>> AUDA was for the mathematicians who told me that they are not >>> interested in cognitive science or philosophy of mind, where such >>> thought experience is common. >>> >>> >> If UDA and AUDA are equivalent in some sense, how do you get the FPI >> conclusion from AUDA? >> > > In AUDA we get only the case of the "probability one", by Bp & Dt, on p > sigma_1. > > Why? > > Well that is what I am explaining, but I need Liz solving some puzzles > before :) >
Oh I see, it's all my fault...?! Yes, I know, I have teenage children..... tell me about it..... I am always at fault, and sometimes (apparently) one step short of being the devil incarnate (that one step being that I don't wear Prada, perhaps :-) Oh well....what were those puzzles again? I think you maybe gave me too much and I fizzled half way through, and then before I could have a second attempt I lost the thread - it's very easy to lose threads on this forum, with new stuff being added all the time. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
