On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Then explain why you don't read the UDA, or why you don't read AUDA, > which is the same thesis, but no more using thought experiences. > AUDA was for the mathematicians who told me that they are not > interested in cognitive science or philosophy of mind, where such > thought experience is common. >
If UDA and AUDA are equivalent in some sense, how do you get the FPI conclusion from AUDA? They don't seem very similar to me at all. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
