On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 12:36:15PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 04 Feb 2014, at 06:49, Russell Standish wrote: > > >On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> > >>Then explain why you don't read the UDA, or why you don't read AUDA, > >>which is the same thesis, but no more using thought experiences. > >>AUDA was for the mathematicians who told me that they are not > >>interested in cognitive science or philosophy of mind, where such > >>thought experience is common. > >> > > > >If UDA and AUDA are equivalent in some sense, how do you get the FPI > >conclusion from AUDA? > > In AUDA we get only the case of the "probability one", by Bp & Dt, > on p sigma_1. > > Why? > > Well that is what I am explaining, but I need Liz solving some > puzzles before :) >
I understand that Bp&Dt gives one of von Neumann's quantum logics, but it still seems an enormous jump from there to the FPI, or to call the Deontic relation a Schroedinger equation, even a little abstract one. But I'll wait until you bring Liz up to speed. I'm enjoying lurking over the exercises, even though I only have enough time to skim them. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics hpco...@hpcoders.com.au University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
