On 5 February 2014 13:18, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote: > It's the easiest way to think about SR. And it works for GR too so long > as you avoid closed time-like loops. But GR and QM seem to be > inconsistent, so it's hard to say either one is a good candidate for what's > real. I just think they're very good approximations over some domains. > > Fair enough. Although QM also uses a form of block time (in fact Newtonian, if anything).
(That plus I have a hard time imagining what else time could possibly be like - even presentism is only block time in more dimensions ... although that short story "Flux" gives an idea) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
