On 2/5/2014 2:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Feb 2014, at 18:32, meekerdb wrote:
...
I have criticized it for it's seeming lack of predictive power - a problem with all
theories of everythingism so far, and also string theory.
That is a technical issue only. As comp has to predict or re-predict all of physics, it
is hardly not predictive. In particular, comp + Theaetetus already provide the logic of
the observable, and up to now, it fits with the facts.
Well it's no good saying it *must be* predictive - if it's true. One can say that about
many theories - including string theory.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
