On 15 Feb 2014, at 17:55, John Clark wrote:
On 15 February 2014 09:03, John Mikes <[email protected]> wrote:
> LizR: but WHO is the observer?
The one great advantage that Many Worlds has over other quantum
interpretations is that Everett doesn't need to answer that
question. That's the reason I like it.
Everett needs a machine able to memorize succession of measurement
results. He needs comp or some weakening of it.
Yes, that is what I like in Everett too.
But then comp forces us to push Everett's logic farer, on the
arithmetical spectrum.
You miss this because you confuse the unique 1p with the 3-1p. If I
explain with the equivalent unique 1-1-p, you throw back the non
unique 3-1-1 p, endlessly.
You might not listen to yourself, nor to your many selves (after
duplications experiences).
The "3" "1" p distinction makes all uses of the pronouns unambiguous
as far as they need for the reasoning to proceed.
You seem to add the noise to make obscure something which is actually
very simple and clear, in 3p sharable notions.
Bruno
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
