On Monday, March 10, 2014 2:08:14 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > That relativism argues against comp, and even implicitly against Church > thesis. But my point is not that comp is true, just that with comp, the > theory QM + comp is redundant, and we have to justify QM (at the least its > logic) from self-reference. And up to now, it looks it works. > > Bruno >
A physicalist would presumably point out that the redundancy of QM+comp doesn't tell you which is original and which is derivative. In the terms of the Aristotle vs. Plato distinction you pointed out, I'm unaware of evidence on which to make a decision. So I don't, which is why I mentioned that ignorance prior. -Gabe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
