What in my reasoning steps is wrong? That is the typical rationalist reaction. The pride of reason that supposes that a little quantity of neurons (created by evolution) plus the little experience and desires can fix the pervasive intelligence of nature. You are ideologically sick.
What you call reason is wishful thinking. childish negation to assume the consequences of your acts. Negation to think in deep. pride that precludes to admit your ignorance and submit to the wishdom of the same nature that you yourself in your hypocrisy admire and want to protect. I repeat: Forget the literature. What in my reasoning steps is wrong? 2014-04-14 10:25 GMT+02:00 LizR <[email protected]>: > On 14 April 2014 19:40, Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2014-04-12 19:42 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> No doubt on this for me. Affordable, and with good user's manuals. >>> Most pregnant kids get pregnant before having has the sexual education >>> school classes according to a recent statistics. >>> >>> For people like most of you, most of you also childless, that are >> disconnected from your human inner sense, it is necessary to talk about >> very basic chains of causations. People that believe that men are machines, >> behave like machines. I ´m very sorry for you. >> >> You silence the inner sense, your nous that tell you: No. that is not >> right. >> >> And I should believe that inner sense because...? > > Well, I can answer that - or rather, I can answer it in the negative. We > should not believe that inner voice. Because that inner voice is the result > of Evolution, which has done a job that is only just good enough to get by, > to make us create the next generation willy-nilly. Evolution tells us to > get knocked up as quickly as possible, evolution tells us to stuff our > faces with sugary food, evolution tells us that the lines with the > arrowheads going opposite ways aren't the same length. It tells us to die > when our bile duct gets blocked, rather than have keyhole surgery. It tells > us to go blind rather than have our cataracts removed. It tells us to fall > off cliffs rather than wear glasses, to be eaten rather than create fire to > scare of predators, to starve to death rather than develop weapons. > > Yes, we have silenced this "nous", this voice of unreason, this voice that > would tell us to live with whatever handicaps chance has dealt out, which > tells us to have children and then die, no matter who we have them with, no > matter how badly they fare as a result. > > Because that's all evolution can see. A blind watchmaker is likely to make > defective watches that only occasionally work. We have the sense to see > further than that, and to say, no, THIS is wrong - the blind hand dealt to > us by evolution is what is wrong, and we have the nous to put it right. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Alberto. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
