Hopefully this is a quick response from me.In no particular order. I will suggest that perhaps Lenin and Trosky might have been exactly as bloodthirsty as Stalin.
On abortion, it makes me wonder about a woman's character, if she use's abortion as a means of entrapment. On Jesus, I don't worry about him, if he is not coming back. Coming back IS the Christian message. On corporations, please know that they fund the Marxist parties world-wide. Crony capitalism = Corporatism= Neo-Marxism, Neo-Stalinism, Progressivism. Weird but true. It's not just crusty old conservatives anymore. National power is good, except when it's not. Different people's can work together cooperatively, without rescinding their national rights. On medicine, space, energy, all that. The UN sucks because it's the world's worst people. A replacement org would be nice. Why should Kiwi's be under the boots of Yanks, for instance? Mao, Stalin, and the rest promised changed and the proletariat believed it because the leaders told them what they wanted to hear. The same thing works with used car sales persons. Buyer beware please. -----Original Message----- From: LizR <[email protected]> To: everything-list <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 8:34 pm Subject: Re: Climate models On 11 April 2014 06:45, <[email protected]> wrote: Feminism I am ok with because equal pay for equal work. As an element of Marxism it sucks, but otherwise its good. Actually Marxism is about equal pay for equal work, too. Abortions are tricky for me, a subject. It's easy to make generalizations if we are not the pregnant ones. wink. Yes, well said. Homosexuality isn't doomed, unless its the New Testament Jesus purging the sinners, and I don't know enough NT to know if this is what Revelations really says. Homosexuality seems to be a part of nature, and so on. I dunno, Jesus kissed Judas if I remember correctly, or was it the other way around? Probably no tongues though. Nationalism is ok, but people still have to work together to make success on many big troubles. On the other hand the idea that the UN should rule things is pathological, because it renders national power to the most corrupt, hateful, and murderous, people that now exist in the world today. So who's that, then? The Taliban? Al Qaeada? The US government? The CEOs of faceless multinational corporations? Change? Well Stalin and Mao promised and delivered change, and so did Adolf. Change is not always a great, good, thing, especially when peddled by progressives as a sales pitch aka propaganda. It's a means of calling dictatorship, which is something quite bad, good. Stalin, Mao and Hitler may have promised change, but they gave us the same boring old shite we've been getting since the year dot - charismatic psychopathic leaders starting their own cult-of-personality pseudo-religions. No change there, we've been doing it for millennia. I suppose it's possible that Lenin, Trosky and co might have achieved some sort of change if the rest of the world hadn't ganged up on them, but their vision was well and truly scuppered by the nations around them who were utterly terrified that their workers might also demand fair pay, or something equally reprehensible. Stalin just swanned into the resulting mess and took over. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
